Controlled
AN OBSERVATION OF THE CONFLUENCE OF STATISTICAL ABERRATIONS, DAM RATIOS, TIMING AND UNCOMMON RAINFALL EVENTS THAT COMBINED TO HAVE OUR LEADERS DRAW INCORRECT CONCLUSIONS. THEIR INFLUENCE ON ACTIONS TAKEN.

Author : J. V. Hodgkinson F. C. A. Chartered Accountant : August 2006 to May 2010    

The relationship of the Wivenhoe/Somerset dam system to its rainfall in the catchments has been quite different from the way it has been presented to us since the joint dams’ inception in 1986. The main rainfall supplying our water is the, season ignoring, rain depressions in the form of Cyclones, Monsoons and large scale rain depressions. They generally cover the whole of South East Queensland at the same time. They provide much more water than our December to March “wet season” which is well known to us.

Mr Rob Drury of SEQWater drew our attention to this in his Courier Mail article of the 10th Summer Rain Courier Mail 10 02 7.jpg (371046 bytes) February 2007. Output from the Government IQQM computer model, covering the 111 years 1890 to 2000, has proven Mr Drury correct. In essence 300mm of rain in the catchments in a few days is a flood and, in the right circumstances, can fill the dams from scratch. On the other hand 3 months of 100mm a month is a comparative trickle. These facts can be buried in official overall rainfall statistics the use of which in dam performance can and did throw up statistical aberrations.

Mr Drury called these rainfall events “uncommon events”. Bureau of Meteorology flood Frequency plus gap years.jpg (180089 bytes) records from 1841 reveal that they occur on average every 3.7 years with most below that average. Therefore those above can extend well above that average such as the recent period of 2001 to 2007.

Mr Drury also provided dam level charts which were not published by the Courier Mail. They provided clear evidence of the importance of "uncommon events" and the inability of the "Summer wet season" to provide sufficient water from as far back as 1992. We will examine them.

This is my review based on official statistics and documents. These statistics and documents are presented to you so that you can arrive at your own conclusions.

 

************************************************************

 

Home

 

May 2009 : Since August 2007 the QWC has applied restriction measures and the requirements are now generally available to the public. This section is now redundant in favour of the updated requirements that we must adhere to.

********************************************

Now redundant but retained for interest


Our normal water requirements

The final calculation is slightly in excess of 1000ML per day. The SEQ Regional Plan part B uses the expression " business as usual "term which to my understanding means - without restrictions of any kind and before the "Emergency measures" as described and Legislated in the Water Commission's web-site. The Requirements are measured on that basis.

In the first instance, the Population serviced by the Requirements.jpg (201573 bytes)Wivenhoe and Somerset Dams were determined. Examination of the SEQ Plan part B indicated the percentages of the areas described as SEQ. The SEQWater web site describes the areas covered by the 3 Dams which includes the North Pine. The calculation comes to 85% of the 2.8 million population. The North Pine population is excised on the basis of Dam capacities. The result is a Population serviced by the two Dams at 2,113,983 or around 2.1 million.

The second requirement was to adopt the SEQ RP Part B method being "per person including Commercial and Industrial at 450 litres per day each". There are adjustments made by me to cater for the Commercial and Industrial from the main Dams. The revision is 474 litres per person per day. The break-up is 300 litres Domestic and 174 Commercial and Industrial.

The third aspect of the Requirements was to measure the calculation with annual depletion of the Dams together with minor estimates of rainfall. These estimates are fully covered in " Rainfall 2001-06" button. You will see from the attached document that the requirement calculations are within tolerance of the annual totals of the depleted Dams together with rainfall in both "low" and "high" yield years.

It was interesting and understandable that in a high rainfall year as 2004, the requirements dip by as much as 6% of capacity. This could well have been the situation in the years 1986 to 2000 covering up to 5 uncommon events. The year 2004 has an accurate assessment of the Megalitres that inflow created. See "Wivenhoe Dam" button.

Confirmation from the South East Queensland Regional Water Supply

The SEQRWSS stage 2 interim report attached confirms Yield Wiv and Som SEQRWSSS Stage 2 interim.jpg (187097 bytes)the water allocation from the Wivenhoe/Somerset Dams is 374,000 ML per annum. This is the volume allocated and required but as we have seen, not capable of being supplied without "uncommon events". It confirms the calculations made above. If reading of the small print is difficult, it is on their web-site page 8 of the SEQRWSS stage 2 interim report. They do qualify their calculations to the extent that effects of a "drought" are not taken into account.

This 374,000ML a year converts to 1024ML per day which agrees with my calculated requirements. The supply from Shortfall.jpg (162076 bytes)these Dams in normal times without "uncommon events" is 481ML per day or 176,000ML annually. Uncommon events we have seen are rare and unpredictable. The South East Queensland regional Water Supply report is based on this 374,000ML. From my reading of copious other reports, particularly of the Mary Valley Traveston Dam proposal, they are all based on this calculation. It may be correct over a great many years but is irrelevant for around 20 year periods.

This amounts to a shortfall of 198,000ML each year until uncommon events. Those who follow the "drought" mantra, without thought, will have their calculations severely distorted.

300 Litres Domestic. Further considerations.

Attached is an extract from a water tank supplier's brochure. They have been in operation for 14 years and service an area from Bundaberg to the Victorian border principally to Country clients. The relevant part is the normal household requirements to be calculated when determining the size of your water tank.

It reveals to us that the normal requirements per person is Rain tanks.jpg (233954 bytes)more than twice the current allowance of 140 litres per day. This is not a revelation to us all. It supports the selection of the SEQ RP part B. However, their main sales are Country and Country people are practiced in water conservation.

The calculations are also available for those who aspire to self sufficiency. There has been a recent move by our Brisbane Lord Mayor to limit the rebate on water tanks to those who link them into household use ( June 2007 ). This is entirely compatible with these conclusions.

Water Commission

The public stated aim of the Water Commission is to reduce the level of water use to 700ML per day. They are Releases into Bne River.jpg (229567 bytes) achieving this through tough water restrictions in operation since May 2005. The Dam releases by SEQWater indicate that they have been reduced to around 50% of normal. It further indicates that the normal requirement is in the region of 1400ML per day and my calculation of our needs may be conservative.

I have not studied the surrounding aspects of water releases but it obviously plays a part. The calculated 1003ML per day requirement is maintained.

Conclusion

The current water requirements from the Wivenhoe and Somerset Dams to resume normal living is a conservative 1003ML per day.